Efficient Assessment: Aligning Grading Rubrics with WSU Learning Goals in UCORE [CAPS] Courses
UCORE Capstone [CAPS] courses bring opportunities for integration, application, and closure to the undergraduate experience. In place since 2015, [CAPS] Assessment Reporting for UCORE is intended to gauge student learning achievement on WSU’s Learning Goals of Undergraduate Education in the context of the general education curriculum as students near graduation. This spotlight offers insight into a tested, efficient approach to assessment of student learning achievement in a UCORE Capstone [CAPS] course through grading rubric alignment.
NEUROSCI 490: Senior Project is a UCORE [CAPS] course where seniors majors demonstrate skills and knowledge in final oral presentations of their semester-long research projects. Worth 20% of the course grade, these presentations also provide direct assessment of student performance on WSU’s Learning Goals for [CAPS] Assessment Reporting for UCORE. Dr. Samantha Gizerian, who teaches this course, has designed a grading rubric and the following three-step process to streamline the production of senior-level achievement data for [CAPS] Assessment Reporting for UCORE.
1. Align the Grading Rubric Traits with WSU Learning Goals
A grading rubric with 13 traits is used to score the students’ final oral presentations and determine each student’s grade on the assignment. For [CAPS] Assessment Reporting for UCORE, Dr. Gizerian developed a crosswalk that aligns specific traits on the grading rubric with the WSU Learning Goals students demonstrate in her assignment.
Crosswalk Aligning WSU Learning Goals and Grading Rubric Traits (Partial List)
| WSU Learning Goal | Grading Rubric Trait |
| Critical Thinking | Student Position: Clearly articulates or proposes the position (perspective, thesis, hypothesis, idea, or claim) inspiring the project |
| Critical Thinking | Student Position: Analyze complexity of the position, synthesize other points of view, and evaluate the project’s limitations |
| Critical Thinking | Conclusion/Outcome: Illustrates the significance and analyzes the implications of conclusion/outcome |
| Integrative Learning | Process/Method: Clearly identifies a process to identify an end product |
| Integrative Learning | Conclusion/Outcome: Integrates knowledge across disciplines to effectively support the conclusion / outcome |
| Information Literacy | Conclusion/Outcome: Articulate & effectively defend conclusion / outcome with evidence (data, discoveries, theories) |
| Oral Communication | Presenter: Engages audience actively and effectively |
| Oral Communication | Presenter: Communicate skillfully about the project |
2. Determine Levels of WSU Learning Goal Achievement Based on Possible Grading Rubric Scores
As part of [CAPS] Assessment Reporting for UCORE, [CAPS] instructors report what percentage of their students exceed expectations, meet expectations, partially meet expectations, or do not meet expectations for graduating seniors on each WSU Learning Goal. Dr. Gizerian’s second step was to review her grading rubric traits, determine the maximum possible scores for each WSU Learning Goal, and then set the range of scores that represent each level of achievement for UCORE’s [CAPS] Assessment Reporting.
Levels of WSU Learning Goal Achievement Based on Grading Rubric Scores (Partial List)
| WSU Learning Goal and Maximum Score Possible on Grading Rubric | Level of Achievement for UCORE'S [CAPS] Assessment | |||
| Does Not Meet Expectations for Graduating Seniors | Partially Meets Expectations for Graduating Seniors | Meets Expectations for Graduating Seniors | Exceeds Expectations for Graduating Seniors | |
| Critical Thinking (24 pts total) | 0-11 | 12-16 | 17-18 | 19-24 |
| Integrative Learning (20 pts total) | 0-9 | 10-13 | 14-15 | 16-20 |
| Information Literacy (8 pts total) | 0-3 | 4 | 5 | 6-8 |
| Oral Communication (24 pts total) | 0-11 | 12-16 | 17-18 | 19-24 |
3. Tally Grading Rubric Scores to Produce Assessment Data for UCORE’s [CAPS] Reporting
Finally, Dr. Gizerian tallied grading rubric scores for each WSU Learning Goal to determine the percentage of students that are exceeding, meeting, partially meeting, or not meeting expectations for [CAPS] Assessment Reporting for UCORE. With the first two steps in place, this becomes a quick process with the use of a spreadsheet. It’s also a process and tool she can reuse each semester to efficiently produce data for UCORE’s [CAPS] Assessment Reporting.
Tallied Grading Rubric Scores for UCORE’s [CAPS] Assessment (Partial List with Mock Data)
| WSU Learning Goal | % (#) of students | ||||
| Does Not Meet Expectations for Graduating Seniors | Partially Meets Expectations for Graduating Seniors | Meets Expectations for Graduating Seniors | Exceeds Expectations for Graduating Seniors | Total | |
| Critical Thinking | 0% (0) | 16% (4) | 48% (12) | 36% (9) | 100% (25) |
| Integrative Learning | 4% (1) | 8% (2) | 60% (15) | 28% (7) | 100% (25) |
| Information Literacy | 0% (0) | 12% (3) | 56% (14) | 32% (8) | 100% (25) |
| Oral Communication | 4% (1) | 8% (2) | 40% (10) | 48% (12) | 100% (25) |
Focusing on the final student presentations for most of her UCORE’s [CAPS] Assessment Reporting has proven a manageable approach. Gizerian explained, “I don’t try to collect data from all assignments in the course, so that assessment doesn’t take up too much time. The final presentation is where students pull things together, from prior assignments scaffolded throughout the semester.”
Aligning grading rubrics and learning goals/outcomes is a flexible approach that can be used with a variety of assignments. To generate assessment data on WSU’s Written Communication learning goal for UCORE’s [CAPS] Assessment Reporting, Dr. Gizerian applied the same three-step process to her grading rubric for the research project papers to determine the percentage of students that exceeded, met, partially met, or did not meet expectations for graduating seniors on Written Communication.
In addition to being a UCORE-designated [CAPS] course, NEUROSCI 490 also serves as a culminating course for Neuroscience majors, and, as a result, also contributes data to program assessment for the BS in Neuroscience. A similar crosswalk has been developed to align the grading rubric traits with program-level student learning outcomes for the BS in Neuroscience, allowing the Neuroscience program to efficiently collect assessment data for senior majors in a similar manner.
“It was gratifying to line up the rubric traits, the Neuroscience program learning outcomes, and WSU’s Learning Goals – and to see how the pieces aligned,” Gizerian noted. “Because NEUROSCI 490 is our culminating course for senior majors, the rubric descriptors and scores are aimed at meeting expectations for graduating seniors, so developing the crosswalks and levels of achievement was straightforward.” She added, “For me, it’s important to be able to show that these are learning outcomes we’re actually assessing.”
For more information about UCORE’s [CAPS] Assessment reporting Requirement, see the UCORE Key Assessment webpage for [CAPS] Assessment.